Hillary Clinton Barack Obama Creating The Socialist States of America, using proven Communist Principles, read the Hillary Clinton Plan Here Saul
Alinsky stated, “There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you
are able to create a social state. The first is the most important!” Reading this article means and demonstrates that you care about America and the future of all the citizens. All the minorities have been fooled and cheated by Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and others.
How To Create A Communist Nation
Joyce Dorothy Parker Ph.D
1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you
control the people.
2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as
high as possible. Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if
you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt – Increase the debt to an
unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will
produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to
defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police
state.
5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of
their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education – Take control of what people
read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God
from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into
the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier
to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Now
let us take a look at what has already happened and what Hillary Clinton wants
to do and what Obama and the Democratic Party has already done. You have to remember that anytime words such
as, but not limited to, “Racist," "Feminist,” etc., are key words used by the Saul Alinsky model
to destroy your enemy and keep them fighting to disconnect those ideas from
them while those making the statements continue on with their ideas, which, in
most cases, do not help the poor or the United States.
Here
is the connection between Hillary Clinton and her idol, Saul Alinsky:
Healthcare
- We see the first idea to be pushed by the Alinsky Communist idea is to
“Control Healthcare.” Remember, when Hillary Clinton was First Lady, she pushed
for a nationwide Healthcare system, exactly what Alinsky outlined to begin the
creation of the Socialist/Communist state. We should make a strong note:
President Obama was also a strong advocate of the Alinsky model. Today, we have
the Obamacare joke of healthcare, but it does follow the Saul Alinsky ideology.
Poverty
– Today, we see that more people live in poverty in the United States, and this
has increased since Obama took office, so here we can clearly see that the
second action in the Alinsky model is being pursued by Obama and we can rest
assured that Hillary Clinton will push this even higher if she is elected;
after all, she supports the Alinsky ideology.
Debt
– The debt of our nation has moved into territory that has never been seen
before during the entire history of the United States. Hillary Clinton wants to continue on this
same line of action by increasing the burden by keeping the debt rising so she
can control all of our lives. Hillary Clinton also shouted very loudly on the stage;
“We will raise the taxes on the middle class.” Strangely, the people cheered!
Gun
Control – This is so far the hardest to complete, but Obama has done all he
can, including coming up with illegal Executive Actions that stifle the
ownership of guns because of his actions. But Hillary Clinton stated that she
would like to see “common sense” gun control, which is code for taking all the
guns from the people. Hillary Clinton has stated that, “… I would like to see
gun control actions like the Australians have.” That would mean total confiscation
of guns and jail time for anyone who does not comply with the government demand
to turn your guns in. Hillary Clinton can do this by placing Supreme Court
Justices that will say the Second Amendment does not apply to the average
citizen - check out the people she will consider for Supreme Court Justices:
they all are AGAINST guns.
Welfare
– This will and has been growing since Obama has been president. Under Hillary
Clinton, it will continue to grow, since she has stated this in many ways and
will increase the welfare rolls, just like Alinsky states. Hillary Clinton will
bring in many more people from the Middle East and place them all on the
welfare rolls, giving them no opportunity to find jobs and by giving them food,
housing, and income, just like her idol Saul Alinsky outlines in his 8 levels
of control.
Education
– Hillary Clinton has clearly stated in her book, It Take A Village, “I believe
the primary role of the state is to teach, train and raise the children.
Parents have a secondary role.”
Here
Hillary Clinton shows very plainly that she will use the Communist/Socialist
Saul Alinsky ideology to “educate” the children, which is actually brainwashing
the children to think that they have to work for the Government to pay for
their education. This alone should make many parents consider not to vote for
this lady who only wants the parents to have a secondary role to their children
and allow the government to have the primary role. This is not the “American”
way to Freedom and pursuit of happiness.
Religion
– This is the most profound act of hatred by the current administration, and
Hillary Clinton will follow through with this ideology, just like Obama is
doing now. Before 2009, our nation could
pray at football games, we could place a cross on public property, we could
worship our beliefs, which are, of the majority, Christian.
Today, our nation
has moved away from the old phrase "God and Country." Today, it is
"Politics and country." Our nation was founded on the belief that God
is our creator, and that is clearly displayed through the Declaration of
Independence.
Some will come out and say
that is not right because the Constitution says the government cannot support
any religion. That would be a very false
statement, since the very idea was that the Government cannot say we have only
one religion, and that is the one the government says it is. Freedom of religion was developed to make
sure the government did not dictate what religion the people had to abide by:
that is what England did, and the founding fathers did not want the government
to dictate what religion to force upon the people. It also did not mean that the government
would make religion be evil and not accepted by the government, as it has done
under the Obama administration. This would be even worse under a Hillary
Clinton administration.
Class
warfare – We can already see this one from Obama and Hillary Clinton doubling
down and saying that the rich have to pay their fair share, meaning, as did
Saul Alinsky, that they have to pay more until they become poor. The fact that
Hillary Clinton is going to continue on with the “Class Warfare" is not to
be doubted for one minute as she does not hide this at all, saying those who
make the most should pay the most. Hillary Clinton will most assuredly divide
the nation even more than Obama has, and this will never be settled until the
United States is so divided that the government will have to intervene to
“separate” what they created: a police state.
Showing
and comparing these 8 items and breaking them down shows that, without a doubt,
Obama, who also studied Saul Alinsky, began the division needed to make the
Communist ideology work, and Hillary Clinton will continue it. If you wish to see our nation coming together
like it did before Obama got into office, do not vote for Hillary Clinton.
How
much does the Communist Party of America support Hillary Clinton? That is perhaps the most interesting question
we could ask. Let us look at an article exposing the fact that the Communist
Party supports Hillary Clinton.
This
article describes what the Communist Party USA likes about her and why it
supports her entirely.
“The
Communist Party USA may not control many actual votes, but what they lack in
support is made up for in enthusiasm.
That
passion was in full display with a seven-person team of “reporters” covering
their national political convention last month. And their convention was the
Democratic National Convention that nominated Hillary Rodham Clinton as their
undisputed candidate for president of the United States.”
Some
of the Communist Party USA's talking points sound an awful lot like Hillary
Clinton’s talking points...or is that the other way around? In either case, the
points are eerily similar. Let’s check some excerpts from the Communist Party’s
article on that.
“Donald
Trump steals wages. He’d pick your pocket in a New York minute. He lies and
spreads hate. He’s a racist and a bully.”
“Do
not underestimate Trump and the Republicans. While the establishment GOP was
surprised by the successful insurgency of so-called outsider Trump, they are
united in purpose: delivering more inequality, more misery, more instability
and violence against working-class people of all races, genders, religions and
sexual orientations. They are united with giant corporations and the
billionaire class in their drive to lower wages and living conditions and
increase their profits and power.”
“With
Senator Bernie Sanders endorsing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the message
was loud and clear, “We’re stronger together.” That is what it will take to win
in November.”
“The
union movement, communities of color, students, women, progressives and the
newborn “political revolution” can help generate voter enthusiasm by talking
and tweeting about Clinton and the issues. Challenging sexism is a must as well
as racism, which has been a coded (and overt) staple of presidential elections
for decades.”
“Winning
in a landslide” is needed now more than ever, and that landslide for Clinton
could swing control of the Senate to Democrats, and other potential positive
effects could be felt on the ‘down ballot’ congressional and state races.”
Wait,
isn’t that what the Democratic Party said - well maybe in different words? It does look like Hillary Clinton has taken
advice from the Communist Party of the USA with her lines. All this time and
the people have been led to believe that Hillary Clinton was the first to use
the words "racism," "sexism," and so on. Please just look
at what the Communist Party states: if it were not on their web site, one would
think it had been written by the Clinton Campaign.
Let
us look at a direct quote of the Communist Party USA paper that describes
Hillary Clinton’s pick for her running mate, Tim Kaine: this is where it gets
weird, as the Communist Party not only fully supports and maybe helps Hillary
Clinton, but also seems to accept her VP, Tim Kaine, with open arms.
“Joseph
Farah, the founder of WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in
his youth, said the CPUSA’s coverage was so effusive in its enthusiasm it put
MSNBC to shame.
“Back
in the day when Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated
by the party as presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years,
the U.S. Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he said. “But, in
recent years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with
the Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”
It
would seem that Hillary Clinton is either working with the Communist Party USA,
or they are working with her. No one can really distinguish the lines between
them, as they are so close to each other that lines between Democrats and
Communists have seemingly vanished since, in 2009, they pushed voters toward
Obama and keep pushing the Democrats into the now very blurred lines between
the old Democratic Party and the current Communist/Democratic Party today. But
check it out for yourself below.
“The
Communists, who for decades ran their own candidates for president and vice
president but supported Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, don’t just like Hillary
and Bernie. The party also gave a big thumbs-up to Clinton’s running mate, Tim
Kaine.
“He’s
a great choice,” wrote staffer Larry Rubin on the first day of the convention.
“Kaine pushed the political envelope of Virginia, an erstwhile red southern
state, in a progressive direction – and won! He was elected mayor of Richmond,
then governor of the state and then senator. Everyone agrees: he’s a sincere,
nice guy.”
No
this should be enough to show that our nation would become totally Socialist
leaning heavily towards Communism under Hillary Rodham Clinton, due to
Democrats continuing on with their ideas from 1856 when they were the party of
slavery. Wait, maybe they really want to bring slavery back, but in the form of
government hand outs! Just check out someone else’s comments on how the
Democrats have moved more toward the Communist side than to the Freedom side.
“David
Kupelian, managing editor of WND.com, had this to say earlier this year in a
commentary on the shrinking divide between the two parties:“Amazing as it may
seem, Barack Obama has dragged the entire Democratic Party so far leftward over
the past seven-plus years that today’s Democratic Party has become almost
indistinguishable from the Communist Party.
“If
that sounds hyperbolic to you, just stop reading right now and pull up the
CPUSA’s website,” he added. “Spend some time reading and digesting it. Try to
discern any major differences between the Communist Party’s concerns,
sensibilities and solutions – on issues from ‘gay’ rights, to unfettered
immigration, to renewable energy, to wealth redistribution, to condemning cops
as racist, to universal health care – and those of today’s Democratic Party.”
The
interest has been largely fueled by Clinton’s suppressed and later released
92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College offering an extensive, largely
positive critique of Alinsky and his work.
Hillary
Clinton’s association with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when
Obama was just 8 years old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis,
a loyal Communist Party activist.
Clinton’s
1969 Wellesley College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An
Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” The thesis received attention when it was released
after the Bill Clinton presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the
White House requested that Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for
Radicals”author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies.”
This
covers a lot, but it has to be shown in order to link it all together to
illustrate the closeness of the Communist and Democratic Party and how it may
also link Hillary Clinton to being a communist simply by allowing this type of
hyperbole to be stated. We show just what has to be shown, and it makes a good
connection to the Hillary Clinton campaign, which follows the Communist Party
USA ideology almost to a tee. That in
and of itself should create a firewall between the White House and Hillary Clinton. If she is elected, the nation built by our
forefathers will have failed, due to the ignorance of seeing what is near the
tip of our noses. If you believe in the Freedom, the Constitution, and our
United States, then you will pass this on to all you know and make it go viral
to show facts that have to be shown here because the Lame Stream Media will
never show, it as they are part of the problem.
“Clinton
was said to have met with Alinsky several times in 1968, when she was writing
her thesis. In her most recent memoir, Clinton wrote that she rejected a job
offer from Alinsky to instead attend law school.
Last
year, WND found that long after Alinsky’s death in June 1972, a group Clinton
co-chaired maintained a working relationship with Alinsky’s main community
organizing outfit, the Industrial Areas Foundation, or IAF.
The partnership
extended into the 1990s and yielded influence over the education policy of the
Bill Clinton presidency, it can now be disclosed. Founded by Alinsky in 1940
and run by him until his death, the IAF is a national community-organizing
network established to implement Alinsky’s expansive organizing agenda. After
Alinsky’s death, the IAF was taken over by his longtime associate and
designated successor, Ed Chambers, who became the group’s executive director.
Dick
Morris, a former top political adviser to Bill Clinton both as governor of
Arkansas and as president, noted to WND that education reform “is the key issue
Hillary Clinton used to propel herself independently to the forefront of
Arkansas politics during Bill’s governorship.”
“The
revelation of how closely linked her efforts were back in the 80s – and have
been since – to an Alinsky radical front group is deeply disturbing and expands
our understanding of Hillary’s fundamental radicalism and commitment to the new
left of Saul Alinsky,” Morris said.
David
Horowitz, whose parents were members of the Communist Party and who himself
became a leader in the new left movement of the 1960s and 1970s before
rejecting it, said the revelation is significant though not surprising.
“When
radicals set out to fundamentally transform a society, the first institution
they attack is the educational system which under their influence becomes a
system of indoctrination in radical ideas,” he told WND.
Interestingly,
the Communist Party USA has not changed its stripes in any significant way. It
hasn’t walked back its 100 percent commitment to Communism. What has changed is
the Democratic Party.
The
drift leftward hit warp speed beginning in the 1990s, according to Farah.
That’s the year Bernie Sanders was first elected to Congress and founded the
Congressional Progressive Caucus.
“One
of his first actions in Congress was to found the Congressional Progressive
Caucus, which was partnered with the Democratic Socialists of America,”
recounts Farah. “No surprise there, because most Americans have no idea of what
the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America
are really all about.”
Farah
reported on the antics of the caucus in 1998.
“Back
then the Congressional Progressive Caucus shared a website with the DSA,” he
wrote. “In other words, these two organizations, one government-funded and the
other a tax-exempt nonprofit, were of like mind and on the same page
politically. What I found back then was astonishing – even for me. On this
shared website, that was quickly scrubbed after I exposed it, was a collection
of songs I can almost hear Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and other members
of the Congressional Progressive Caucus singing in harmony. One of my favorites
back then – – was “Red Revolution” sung to the tune of “Red, Red Robbin.”
“For
those not trained in the lingo of communism, the dictionary definition of
‘bourgeoisie,’ is, and I quote: ‘(in Marxist theory) the class that, in
contrast to the proletariat or wage-earning class, is primarily concerned with
property values,'” wrote Farah. “If you’ve got property, if you’re part of the
middle class, these people not only want to raise your taxes, they want to kill
you with knives and guns!”
Meanwhile,
an email sent out by the Communist Party USA over the weekend had this to say:
“The 2016 elections are in full swing. Many of our districts and clubs and
members are actively participating in the campaign to strike a blow to the extreme
right and defeat Donald Trump and other down ballot GOP extremists. If you’re
not yet involved, there are many ways to get connected with labor and our
allies, especially in the key battleground states and in targeted congressional
and state legislative races. But no matter where you live you can be part of
this exciting election. We can defeat Trump, oust right-wing majorities in
Congress and statehouses while also building powerful labor-led people’s
movements, advancing a progressive agenda and political independence at the
grassroots. We have some great tools, beginning with People’s World daily (sic)
Marxist analysis.”
.
.
From:tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com
To:
jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com,
slatham@hillaryclinton.com, kschake@hillaryclinton.com,
creynolds@hillaryclinton.com, bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-01-25 00:28
Subject: HRC Paid Speeches
Team,
Attached
are the flags from HRC’s paid speeches we have from HWA. I put
some
highlights below. There is a lot of policy positions that we should
In terms of what was opened to the press and what
was not, the Washington
give an extra scrub with Policy.
Examiner
got a hold of one of the private speech contracts (her speeches to
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clintons-speeches-are-cozy-for-wall-streeters-but-closed-to-journalists/article/2553294/section/author/dan-friedman
universities were typically open press), so this is
worth a read
*CLINTON
ADMITS SHE IS OUT OF TOUCH*
*Hillary Clinton: “I'm Kind Of Far Removed” From
The Struggles Of The
Middle Class
“Because The Life I've Lived And The Economic, You Know,
Fortunes
That My Husband And I Now Enjoy.” *“And I am not taking a position
on any
policy, but I do think there is a growing sense of anxiety and even
had that feeling when I was growing up. Never. I
mean, were there really
anger in the country over the feeling that the game
is rigged. And I never
rich
people, of course there were. My father loved to complain about big
business and big government, but we had a solid
middle class upbringing.
didn't believe in mortgages. So I lived that. And
now, obviously, I'm
We had good public schools. We had accessible
health care. We had our
little, you know, one-family house that, you know,
he saved up his money,
kind of far
removed because the life I've lived and the economic, you know,
fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy, but I
haven't forgotten it.”
[Hillary Clinton Remarks at Goldman-Black Rock,
2/4/14]
*CLINTON SAYS YOU NEED TO HAVE A PRIVATE AND PUBLIC
POSITION ON POLICY*
*Clinton: “But If Everybody's Watching, You Know,
All Of The Back Room
Discussions
And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To
Say The Least.
So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”*
word, "balance" -- how to balance the
public and the private efforts that
CLINTON: You just have to sort of figure out how to
-- getting back to that
are
necessary to be successful, politically, and that's not just a comment
and if you saw the Spielberg movie, Lincoln, and
how he was maneuvering and
about today. That, I think, has probably been true
for all of our history,
working to
get the 13th Amendment passed, and he called one of my favorite
predecessors, Secretary Seward, who had been the
governor and senator from
who knew how to make a deal, and they just kept
going at it. I mean,
New York, ran against Lincoln for president, and he
told Seward, I need
your help to get this done. And Seward called some
of his lobbyist friends
politics is
like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been
that way, but we usually end up where we need to
be. But if everybody's
watching, you know, all of the back room
discussions and the deals, you
it's like when you guys go into some kind of a
deal, you know, are you
know, then people get a little nervous, to say the
least. So, you need both
a public and a private position. And finally, I
think -- I believe in
evidence-based decision making. I want to know what
the facts are. I mean,
going to do
that development or not, are you going to do that renovation or
not, you know, you look at the numbers. You try to
figure out what's going
to work and what's not going to work. [Clinton
Speech For National
Multi-Housing Council, 4/24/13]
*CLINTON TALKS ABOUT HOLDING WALL STREET
ACCOUNTABLE ONLY FOR POLITICAL
REASONS*
*Clinton Said That The Blame Placed On The United
States Banking System For
The Crisis “Could Have Been Avoided In Terms Of
Both Misunderstanding And
Really
Politicizing What Happened.”*
“That was one of the reasons that I
started
traveling in February of '09, so people could, you know, literally
yell at me
for the United States and our banking system causing this
conventional wisdom. And I think that there's a lot
that could have been
everywhere. Now, that's an oversimplification we
know, but it was the
avoided in
terms of both misunderstanding and really politicizing what
know, what happened, how did it happen, how do we
prevent it from
happened with greater transparency, with greater
openness on all sides, you
happening?
You guys help us figure it out and let's make sure that we do
it right this time. And I think that everybody was
desperately trying to
[Goldman Sachs AIMS Alternative Investments
Symposium, 10/24/13]
fend off the worst effects institutionally,
governmentally, and there just
wasn't that opportunity to try to sort this out, and
that came later.”
*Clinton:
“Even If It May Not Be 100 Percent True, If The Perception Is
That Somehow The Game Is Rigged, That Should Be A
Problem For All Of
Us.” *“Now,
it's important to recognize the vital role that the
financial markets play
in our
economy and that so many of you are contributing to. To function
command trust and confidence, because we all rely
on the market's
effectively those markets and the men and women who
shape them have to
transparency and integrity. So even if it may not be 100 percent true,
if
for all of us, and we have to be willing to make
that absolutely clear.
the perception is that somehow the game is rigged,
that should be a problem
And if
there are issues, if there's wrongdoing, people have to be held
accountable and we have to try to deter future bad
behavior, because the
*CLINTON SUGGESTS WALL STREET INSIDERS ARE WHAT IS
NEEDED TO FIX WALL
public trust is at the core of both a free market
economy and a democracy.”
[Clinton Remarks to Deutsche Bank, 10/7/14]
STREET*
*Clinton Said Financial Reform “Really Has To Come
From The Industry
Itself.”
*“Remember what Teddy Roosevelt did. Yes, he took on what he saw
as the
excesses in the economy, but he also stood against the excesses in
reaction. He wanted to try to figure out how to get
back into that balance
politics. He didn't want to unleash a lot of
nationalist, populistic
that has
served America so well over our entire nationhood. Today, there's
itself, and how we can strengthen our economy,
create more jobs at a time
more that can and should be done that really has to
come from the industry
where
that's increasingly challenging, to get back to Teddy Roosevelt's
square deal. And I really believe that our country
and all of you are up
People That Know The Industry Better Than Anybody
Are The People Who Work
to that job.” [Clinton Remarks to Deutsche Bank,
10/7/14]
*Speaking About The Importance Of Proper Regulation,
Clinton Said “The
In The
Industry.”* “I mean, it's still happening, as you know. People are
looking back and trying to, you know, get
compensation for bad mortgages
bad. How do you get to the golden key, how do we
figure out what works?
and all the rest of it in some of the agreements
that are being reached.
There's nothing magic about regulations, too much
is bad, too little is
And the
people that know the industry better than anybody are the people
who work in the industry. And I think there has to
be a recognition that,
everybody's interest that we have a better
framework, and not just for the
you know, there's so much at stake now, I mean, the
business has changed so
much and decisions are made so quickly, in nano
seconds basically.
We
spend trillions of dollars to travel around the
world, but it's in
United
States but for the entire world, in which to operate and trade.”
[Goldman Sachs AIMS Alternative Investments
Symposium, 10/24/13]
*CLINTON ADMITS NEEDING WALL STREET FUNDING*
*Clinton Said That Because Candidates Needed Money
From Wall Street To Run
For Office,
People In New York Needed To Ask Tough Questions About The
Economy
Before Handing Over Campaign Contributions. *“Secondly, running for
office in
our country takes a lot of money, and candidates have to go out
fundraising for candidates on both sides of the
aisle, and it's also our
and raise it. New York is probably the leading site
for contributions for
economic
center. And there are a lot of people here who should ask some
tough questions before handing over campaign
contributions to people who
*Clinton: “It Would Be Very Difficult To Run For
President Without Raising
were really playing chicken with our whole
economy.” [Goldman Sachs AIMS
Alternative Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
A Huge
Amount Of Money And Without Having Other People Supporting You
Because Your Opponent Will Have Their Supporters.”*
“So our system is, in
many ways,
more difficult, certainly far more expensive and much longer
than a
parliamentary system, and I really admire the people who subject
themselves to it. Even when I, you know, think they
should not be elected
president, I
still think, well, you know, good for you I guess, you're out
it's something -- I would like -- you know,
obviously as somebody who has
there promoting democracy and those crazy ideas of
yours. So I think that
been
through it, I would like it not to last as long because I think it's
very distracting from what we should be doing every
day in our public
million or some such enormous amount, and in the
last campaign President
business. I would like it not to be so expensive. I
have no idea how you
do that. I mean, in my campaign -- I lose track,
but I think I raised $250
Obama
raised 1.1 billion, and that was before the Super PACs and all of
this other money just rushing in, and it's so
ridiculous that we have this
kind of in the wild west, and, you know, it would
be very difficult to run
kind of free for all with all of this financial
interest at stake, but, you
know, the Supreme Court said that's basically what
we're in for. So we're
for
president without raising a huge amount of money and without having
other people supporting you because your opponent
will have their
supporters. So I think as hard as it was when I
ran, I think it's even
*CLINTON TOUTS HER RELATIONSHIP TO WALL STREET AS A
SENATOR*
harder now.” [Clinton Speech For General Electric’s
Global Leadership
Meeting – Boca Raton, FL, 1/6/14]
*Clinton: As Senator, “I Represented And Worked
With” So Many On Wall
Street And
“Did All I Could To Make Sure They Continued To Prosper” But
Still Called
For Closing Carried Interest Loophole. *In remarks at Robbins,
Gellar,
Rudman & Dowd in San Diego, Hillary Clinton said, “When I was a
principled people who made their living in finance.
But even thought I
Senator from New York, I represented and worked
with so many talented
represented
them and did all I could to make sure they continued to
skyrocketing CEO pay. I also was calling in '06,
'07 for doing something
prosper, I called for closing the carried interest
loophole and addressing
about the
mortgage crisis, because I saw every day from Wall Street
literally to main streets across New York how a
well-functioning financial
about subprime mortgages and called for regulating
derivatives and over
system is essential. So when I raised early
warnings about early warnings
complex financial products, I didn't get some
big arguments, because people
sort of said, no, that makes sense. But boy, have
we had fights about it
Together After 9/11 To Rebuild Downtown, And A Lot
Of Respect For The Work
ever since.” [Hillary Clinton’s Remarks at Robbins
Geller Rudman & Dowd in
San Diego, 9/04/14]
*Clinton On Wall Street: “I Had Great Relations And
Worked So Close
You Do And
The People Who Do It.” *
“Now, without going over how we got to
where we are
right now, what would be your advice to the Wall Street
community
and the big banks as to the way forward with those two important
decisions?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I represented all of you
for eight
years. I had
great relations and worked so close together after 9/11 to
rebuild
downtown, and a lot of respect for the work you do and the people
who do it,
but I do -- I think that when we talk about the regulators and
you know, were devastating, and they had
repercussions throughout the
the politicians, the economic consequences of bad
decisions back in '08,
world.”
[Goldman Sachs AIMS Alternative Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
*CLINTON TALKS ABOUT THE CHALLENGES RUNNING FOR
OFFICE*
*Hillary
Clinton Said There Was “A Bias Against People Who Have Led
Successful
And/Or Complicated Lives,” Citing The Need To Divese Of Assets,
Positions,
And Stocks.* “SECRETARY CLINTON: Yeah. Well, you know what
he had a fortune. And when he left Washington, he
had a small
Bob Rubin said about that. He said, you know, when
he came to Washington,
-- MR.
BLANKFEIN: That’s how you have a small fortune, is you
go to Washington. SECRETARY CLINTON: You go to
Washington.
successful and/or complicated lives. You know, the
divestment of assets,
Right. But, you know, part of the problem with the
political
situation, too, is that there is such a bias
against people who have led
the
stripping of all kinds of positions, the sale of stocks. It just
becomes very onerous and unnecessary.” [Goldman Sachs
Builders And
Innovators Summit, 10/29/13]
Oh, long, definitely. URSULA BURNS: Republicans?
SECRETARY CLINTON:
*CLINTON SUGGESTS SHE IS A MODERATE*
*Clinton Said That Both The Democratic And
Republican Parties Should Be
“Moderate.” *“URSULA BURNS: Interesting. Democrats?
SECRETARY CLINTON:
Unfortunately, at the time, short. URSULA BURNS: Okay. We'll go back to
questions. SECRETARY CLINTON: We need two parties.
URSULA BURNS: Yeah, we
*Clinton: “Simpson-Bowles… Put Forth The Right
Framework. Namely, We Have
do need two parties. SECRETARY CLINTON: Two
sensible, moderate, pragmatic
parties.” [Hillary Clinton Remarks, Remarks at
Xerox, 3/18/14]
To
Restrain Spending, We Have To Have Adequate Revenues, And We Have To
Incentivize Growth. It's A Three-Part Formula… And
They Reached An
Agreement. But What Is Very Hard To Do Is To Then
Take That Agreement If
heard from Erskine earlier today -- put forth the
right framework. Namely,
You Don't Believe That You're Going To Be Able To
Move The Other Side.”*
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, this may be borne more out
of hope than
experience in the last few years. But
Simpson-Bowles -- and I know you
we have to
restrain spending, we have to have adequate revenues, and we
have to incentivize growth. It's a three-part
formula. The specifics can
be negotiated depending upon whether we're acting
in good faith or not. And
is very hard to do is to then take that agreement
if you don't believe that
what Senator Simpson and Erskine did was to bring
Republicans and Democrats
alike to the table, and you had the full range of
ideological views from I
think Tom Coburn to Dick Durbin. And they reached
an agreement. But what
you're
going to be able to move the other side. And where we are now is in
this gridlocked dysfunction. So you've got
Democrats saying that, you know,
you have to have more revenues; that's the sine qua
non of any kind of
agreement. You have Republicans saying no, no, no
on revenues; you have to
the long aftermath of the '08 crisis. [Clinton
Speech For Morgan Stanley,
cut much more deeply into spending. Well, looks
what's happened. We are
slowly returning to growth. It's not as much or as
fast as many of us
would like to see, but, you know, we're certainly
better off than our
European friends, and we're beginning to, I
believe, kind of come out of
4/18/13]
*Clinton: “The Simpson-Bowles Framework And The Big
Elements Of It Were
Right… You Have To Restrain Spending, You Have To
Have Adequate Revenues,
And You Have To Have Growth.”* CLINTON: So, you
know, the Simpson-Bowles
framework and the big elements of it were right.
The specifics can be
negotiated and argued over. But you got to do all
three. You have to
restrain spending, you have to have adequate
revenues, and you have to have
growth. And I think we are smart enough to figure
out how to do that.
[Clinton Speech For Morgan Stanley, 4/18/13]
*CLINTON IS AWARE OF SECURITY CONCERNS AROUND
BLACKBERRIES*
*Clinton: “At The State Department We Were Attacked
Every Hour, More Than
Once An
Hour By Incoming Efforts To Penetrate Everything We Had. And That
Was True
Across The U.S. Government.”* CLINTON: But, at the State
efforts to penetrate everything we had. And that
was true across the U.S.
Department we were attacked every hour, more than
once an hour by incoming
government.
And we knew it was going on when I would go to China, or I
plane, with the batteries out, because this is a
new frontier. And they're
would go to Russia, we would leave all of our
electronic equipment on the
trying to
find out not just about what we do in our government. They're
trying to find out about what a lot of companies do
and they were going
it's not like the only government in the world that
is doing anything is
after the personal emails of people who worked in
the State Department. So
the United
States. But, the United States compared to a number of our
competitors is the only government in the world
with any kind of
safeguards, any kind of checks and balances. They
may in many respects
that material intentionally or unintentionally,
because of the way it can
need to be strengthened and people need to be
reassured, and they need to
have their protections embodied in law. But, I
think turning over a lot of
be drained,
gave all kinds of information not only to big countries, but to
networks and terrorist groups, and the like. So I
have a hard time thinking
that somebody who is a champion of privacy and
liberty has taken refuge in
thank you so much. I mean, really, I don't know. I
have a hard time
Russia under Putin's authority. And then he calls
into a Putin talk show
and says, President Putin, do you spy on people?
And President Putin says,
well, from one intelligence professional to
another, of course not. Oh,
following
it. [Clinton Speech At UConn, 4/23/14]
*Hillary Clinton: “When I Got To The State
Department, It Was Still Against
The Rules To Let Most -- Or Let All Foreign Service
Officers Have Access To
A Blackberry.” *
“I mean, let's face it, our government is woefully,
woefully
behind in all of its policies that affect the use of technology.
When I got
to the State Department, it was still against the rules to let
You couldn't have desktop computers when Colin
Powell was there.
most -- or let all Foreign Service Officers have
access to a Blackberry.
Everything
that you are taking advantage of, inventing and using, is still
a generation or two behind when it comes to our
government.” [Hillary
Personal Devices” Off The Plane In China And
Russia. *“I mean, probably the
Clinton Remarks at Nexenta, 8/28/14]
*Hillary Clinton: “We Couldn't Take Our Computers,
We Couldn't Take Our
most
frustrating part of this whole debate are countries acting like we're
the only people in the world trying to figure out
what's going on. I mean,
anything off the plane because they're so good,
they would penetrate them
every time I went to countries like China or
Russia, I mean, we couldn't
take our computers, we couldn't take our personal devices,
we couldn't take
in a
minute, less, a nanosecond. So we would take the batteries out, we'd
leave them on the plane.” [Hillary Clinton Remarks
at Nexenta, 8/28/14]
*Clinton Said When She Got To State, Employees
“Were Not Mostly Permitted
permitted to have handheld devices. I mean, so
you're thinking how do we
To Have Handheld Devices.”* “You know, when Colin
Powell showed up as
Secretary of State in 2001, most State Department
employees still didn't
even have computers on their desks. When I got
there they were not mostly
operate in
this new environment dominated by technology, globalizing
forces? We have to change, and I can't expect
people to change if I don't
try to model it and lead it.” [Clinton Speech For
General Electric’s Global
Leadership Meeting – Boca Raton, FL, 1/6/14]
China, you know that you can’t bring your phones
and your computers. And
*Hillary Clinton Said You Know You Can’t Bring Your
Phone And Computer When
Traveling To China And Russia And She Had To Take
Her Batteries Out And Put
them In A Special Box. *“And anybody who has ever
traveled in other
countries, some of which shall remain nameless,
except for Russia and
if you do,
good luck. I mean, we would not only take the batteries out, we
would leave the batteries and the devices on the
plane in special boxes.
Now, we didn’t do that because we thought it would
be fun to tell somebody
about. We did it because we knew that we were all
targets and that we
could be very useful contributors to that
conversation because you’re
would be totally vulnerable. So it’s not only what
others do to us and what
we do to them and how many people are involved in
it. It’s what’s the
purpose of it, what is being collected, and how can
it be used. And there
are clearly people in this room who know a lot
about this, and some of you
sophisticated enough to know that it’s not just, do it, don’t do it. We
have to have a way of doing it, and then we have to
have a way of analyzing
it, and then we have to have a way of sharing it.”
[Goldman Sachs Builders
And Innovators Summit, 10/29/13]
*Hillary Clinton Lamented How Far Behind The State
Department Was In
personnel policies haven’t kept up with the changes
necessary in
Technology, Saying “People Were Not Even Allowed To
Use Mobile Devices
Because Of Security Issues.” *“Personally, having,
you know, lived and
worked in the White House, having been a senator,
having been Secretary of
State, there has traditionally been a great pool of
very talented,
hard-working people. And just as I was saying about
the credit market, our
government.
We have a lot of difficulties in getting—when I got to the
State Department, we were so far behind in
technology, it was
embarrassing. And, you know, people were not even
allowed to use mobile
devices because of security issues and cost issues,
and we really had to
try to push into the last part of the 20th Century
in order to get people
functioning in 2009 and ‘10.” [Goldman Sachs
Builders And Innovators
Summit, 10/29/13]
*CLINTON REMARKS ARE PRO KEYSTONE AND PRO TRADE*
*Clinton: “So I Think That Keystone Is A
Contentious Issue, And Of Course
It Is
Important On Both Sides Of The Border For Different And Sometimes
Opposing
Reasons…” *“So I think that Keystone is a contentious issue, and
of course it
is important on both sides of the border for different and
our relationship will get deeper and stronger and
put us in a position to
sometimes opposing reasons, but that is not our
relationship. And I think
really be global
leaders in energy and climate change if we worked more
*Hillary Clinton Said Her Dream Is A Hemispheric
Common Market,
closely together. And that's what I would like to
see us do.” [Remarks at
tinePublic, 6/18/14]
With Open
Trade And
Open Markets.
*“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with
open trade and open borders,
some time in the future with energy that is as
green and sustainable as we can get it, powering
growth and opportunity for
every person
in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p.
*Hillary Clinton Said We Have To Have A Concerted
Plan To Increase Trade;
28]
We Have To
Resist Protectionism And Other Kinds Of Barriers To Trade.
*“Secondly,
I think we have to have a concerted plan to
increase trade already under
the current
circumstances, you know, that Inter-American Development Bank
figure is
pretty surprising.
There is so much more we can do, there is a
lot of low
hanging fruit but businesses on both sides have to make it a
priority and
it's not for governments to do but governments can either
make it easy or make it hard and we have to resist,
protectionism, other
kinds of
barriers to market access and to trade and I would like to see
president X or president Y but a consistent one.”
[05162013 Remarks to
this get much more attention and be not just a
policy for a year under
Banco
Itau.doc, p. 32]
*CLINTON IS MORE FAVORABLE TO CANADIAN HEALTH CARE
AND SINGLE PAYER*
“Is As Good Or Better On Primary Care,” But “They
Do Impose Things Like
*Clinton Said Single-Payer Health Care Systems “Can
Get Costs Down,” And
Waiting
Times.” *“If you look at countries that are comparable, like
Switzerland or Germany, for example, they have
mixed systems. They don't
like Scandinavia, Canada, and elsewhere, they can
get costs down because,
have just a single-payer system, but they have very
clear controls over
budgeting and accountability. If you look at the
single-payer systems,
you know,
although their care, according to statistics, overall is as good
or better on primary care, in particular, they do
impose things like
*Clinton Cited President Johnson’s Success In
Establishing Medicare And
waiting times, you know. It takes longer to get
like a hip replacement
than it might take here.” [Hillary Clinton remarks
to ECGR Grand Rapids,
6/17/13]
Medicaid
And Said She Wanted To See The U.S. Have Universal Health Care
Like In Canada.*
“You know, on healthcare we are the prisoner of our
past.
The way we got to develop any kind of medical
insurance program was during
World War II
when companies facing shortages of workers began to offer
1940s healthcare was seen as a privilege connected
to employment. And
healthcare benefits as an inducement for
employment. So from the early
after the
war when soldiers came back and went back into the market there
model continued.
was a lot of competition, because the economy was
so heated up. So that
And then of course our large labor unions bargained
for
healthcare
with the employers that their members worked for.
So from the
early 1940s
until the early 1960s we did not have any Medicare, or our
program for
the poor called Medicaid until President Johnson was able to
get both
passed in 1965.
So the employer model continued as the primary
means by
which working people got health insurance.
People over 65 were
eligible for
Medicare. Medicaid, which was a partnership, a funding
partnership
between the federal government and state governments, provided
some, but by
no means all poor people with access to healthcare. So what
successful on Medicare and Medicaid, but didn't
touch the employer based
we've been struggling with certainly Harry Truman,
then Johnson was
system,
then actually Richard Nixon made a proposal that didn't go
anywhere, but was quite far reaching. Then with my
husband's
administration we worked very hard to come up with
a system,
but we were
very much
constricted by the political realities that if you had your
insurance
from your employer you were reluctant to try anything else.
And
so we were
trying to build a universal system around the employer-based
system. And
indeed now with President Obama's legislative success in
have primarily an employer-based system, but we now
have people able to get
getting the Affordable Care Act passed that is what
we've done. We still
subsidized
insurance.
So we have health insurance companies playing a
major role
in the provision of healthcare,
both to the employed whose
employers
provide health insurance, and to those who are working but on
their own
are not able to afford it and their employers either don't
struggling. We've made a lot of progress.
provide it, or don't provide it at an affordable
price. We are still
Ten million Americans now have
insurance
who didn't have it before the Affordable Care Act, and that is a
great step
forward. (Applause.) And what we're going to have to continue
employers drop more people from insurance so that
they go into what we call
to do is monitor what the costs are and watch
closely to see whether
the health
exchange system.
So we're really just at the beginning. But we
do have
Medicare for people over 65. And you couldn't, I don't think, take
it away if
you tried, because people are very satisfied with it, but we
system to more people. So we're in a learning
period as we move forward
also have a lot of political and financial
resistance to expanding that
with the
implementation of the Affordable Care Act. And I'm hoping that
legislation you're going to have, those will be
remedied and we can really
whatever the shortfalls or the glitches have been,
which in a big piece of
take a hard
look at what's succeeding, fix what isn't, and keep moving
forward to get to affordable universal healthcare
coverage like you have
here in Canada. [Clinton Speech For tinePublic –
Saskatoon, CA, 1/21/15]
.
No comments:
Post a Comment